Question

The year in 2186 in an effort to eliminate discrimination and competition, humans have been genetically engineered to begin life as clones. From there, the single global government provides the same education and health care to all citizens. Every home is exactly the same. everyone receives the same salary, and every family is the same size Outliers are "removed from society in order to ensure uniformity. After several generations, human genetics naturally begin to diversify, and soon the outliers far outnumber the indistinguishable ciones

Which statement describes the aesthetic impact that the author of this passage most likely intends?

A. To convey the idea that a group's matus in society can be reversed over tame
B. To give readers a feeling of hope that the outliers can restore a healthy society
C. To give readers a sense of satisfaction that people are accepting their roles in society
D. To develop the theme that a diverse society is more desirable than a homogenous спе

Answer 1

The author of the passage likely aims to show that despite efforts to create uniformity through genetic engineering, human diversity naturally asserts itself and is preferable to homogeneity. Critique of eugenics and exploration of ethical concerns regarding genetic manipulation are encountered, implying the value of a diverse society. Option D is the correct answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the hypothetical scenario presented, where humans are genetically engineered to start life as clones with the intent to eliminate discrimination and competition, the author likely intends to convey the aesthetic impact that diversity eventually prevails and is more desirable than homogeneity.

This is because, despite initial attempts at uniformity, human genetics naturally begin to diversify and outliers soon outnumber the original clones. This suggests an underlying message about the resilience and inherent value of human diversity. The passage also touches on themes of resistance against imposed uniformity and the natural propensity for human variation, which may align with the idea that forced equality can stifle individuality and lead to societal stagnation.

Considering the historical context provided by the Second International Eugenics Conference and other references to genetic modification and public policy, the passage seems to critique the concept of eugenics and its artificial influence on human genetics. It raises ethical questions about the extent to which we should manipulate the human genome, the potential for inequality that may arise from genetic enhancements available only to the wealthy, and the overall impact of such actions on human society and biodiversity. The discussion hints at the possibility of new forms of discrimination emerging if genetic modifications create disparities among people.

Ultimately, the statement that the author most likely intends to convey is that a diverse society is more desirable than a homogenous one, which aligns with option D.