Final answer:
The assertion that the Mexican Army was defeated due to its composition of inexperienced forces is false. Several other factors like superior military strategies, lack of resources, and the impact of diseases played significant roles in the outcomes of various conflicts involving the Mexican Army.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the Mexican Army was defeated because it was made of inexperienced soldiers, peasants, Indians, and former servants is false. There were several factors contributing to the defeats experienced by the Mexican Army in various conflicts with the United States and others. One major factor was the lack of resources and proper planning. For example, during the Mexican-American War, the American military had advantages in military strategies, training, and leadership from institutions like West Point and the Naval Academy.
On another occasion, during the Texas Revolution at the Battle of the Alamo, the Mexican Army's sheer numbers eventually led them to breach the mission's walls, despite heavy casualties inflicted by the defenders' artillery fire. Similarly, the fall of the Aztec Empire under Spanish conquest was a result of superior military technology and tactics utilized by the Spanish, combined with geopolitical factors such as alliances with local tribes, and the devastating impact of diseases like smallpox.
The complexity of these historical conflicts underscores the fact that attributing the Mexican Army's defeats to the composition of its forces simplifies the multifaceted nature of military confrontations in history.