66.1k views
2 votes
When can you legitimately draw a cause-and-effect conclusion from a randomized experiment?

A) When the p-value is small
B) Always, no matter what the p-value is
C) Never, no matter what the p-value is
D) When the p-value is large

User Keto
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

A cause-and-effect conclusion from a randomized experiment can be drawn when the p-value is small, particularly less than the alpha level (such as 0.05), as it suggests that the null hypothesis is unlikely and should be rejected.

Step-by-step explanation:

You can legitimately draw a cause-and-effect conclusion from a randomized experiment when the p-value is small. Specifically, this occurs when the p-value is less than the alpha level (often set at 0.05 or 5 percent), because it indicates that the observed results are very unlikely under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. In such a case, you would reject the null hypothesis, suggesting a possible causation by whatever intervention or variable you are testing.

In practice, it's essential to compare the p-value to a predetermined significance level (α). If the p-value is less than α, you reject the null hypothesis. For example, with an α of 0.05:

  • If the p-value < 0.05, reject the null hypothesis.
  • If the p-value ≥ 0.05, do not reject the null hypothesis.

The correct answer to the question is A) When the p-value is small. A small p-value suggests that the event observed is a rare event under the null hypothesis, providing stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.

User Klues
by
8.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories