94.5k views
4 votes
suppose y1, . . . , yn have the following distribution function, fy (y) = ( e −y θ θ < x < [infinity], 0 o.w. prove that y(1) = min(y1, . . . , yn) is sufficient.

User Camenwolf
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

To prove that y(1) = min(y1, . . . , yn) is sufficient, we need to show that the conditional distribution function of the random variables y1, . . . , yn given y(1) does not depend on the parameter theta.

Step-by-step explanation:

To prove that y(1) = min(y1, . . . , yn) is sufficient, we need to show that the conditional distribution function of the random variables y1, . . . , yn given y(1) does not depend on the parameter theta.

  1. First, let's find the conditional distribution function of y1, . . . , yn given y(1). The probability that y1, . . . , yn are all greater than some constant c, given that y(1) is also greater than c, is:
  2. P(y1 > c, . . . , yn > c | y(1) > c) = P(y1 > c, . . . , yn > c)
  3. This probability is equal to the joint distribution function of y1, . . . , yn evaluated at c, which is:
  4. P(y1 > c, . . . , yn > c) = (e^(-c*theta))^n = e^(-n*c*theta)
  5. Since this probability does not depend on theta, we have shown that the conditional distribution function of y1, . . . , yn given y(1) does not depend on the parameter theta. Therefore, we can conclude that y(1) = min(y1, . . . , yn) is a sufficient statistic.

User Ossama
by
8.2k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories