9.4k views
5 votes
Technician a says extending a frame to carry a long body tends to spread the load over a longer surface of the frame. technician b says if heavy loads are concentrated near the weld, it is likely to fail. who is correct?

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

Both technicians are correct: extending a frame helps distribute the load, but heavy loads concentrated at the weld can lead to failure. A bouncing trailer on the highway is likely nearly empty as heavy loads would dampen such oscillations.

Step-by-step explanation:

Both technicians in the question make valid points about the distribution of load in an extended vehicle frame. Technician A mentions that extending a frame to carry a long body tends to spread the load over a longer surface of the frame, which is typically correct. An extended frame allows the weight to be distributed across a greater area, which can reduce the stress on any single point of the frame.

On the other hand, Technician B points out that if heavy loads are concentrated near the weld, it is more likely to fail. This is also correct as the introduction of a weld can create a potential weak point in the frame where concentrated stresses can lead to fatigue and eventual failure, especially if the weld is not properly reinforced.

Therefore, when extending a vehicle's frame for transporting long bodies or heavy loads, it's important to consider both the overall load distribution and the specific reinforcement of welded areas to ensure safety and durability.

When you observe a trailer on the highway bouncing up and down slowly, it suggests that the trailer is nearly empty. A heavily loaded trailer would have less bounce because the weight of the load would dampen the oscillations caused by bumps or irregularities on the road surface. The mass acts as a stabilizing force, reducing the amplitude of the bounces.

User Cres
by
8.1k points