Question

Which of the following is not a rationale of strict product liability?

a. Manufacturers should not escape liability simply because they typically do not sign a formal contract with the end-user.
b. The law should protect consumers against unsafe products.
c. Manufacturers should not escape liability simply because they acted negligently as opposed to intentionally.
d. Manufacturers and sellers of products are in the best position to bear the costs of injuries caused by their products.

Answer 1

Strict product liability holds manufacturers and sellers accountable for injuries caused by their products, regardless of negligence or intent. Option d is not a rationale of strict product liability.

Step-by-step explanation:

The rationale of strict product liability is to hold manufacturers and sellers accountable for the injuries caused by their products, regardless of negligence or intent. The option that does not align with this rationale is d. Manufacturers and sellers of products are in the best position to bear the costs of injuries caused by their products. The rationale for strict product liability is not solely based on the financial burden placed on manufacturers and sellers, but rather on the principle that they should be responsible for the safety of their products.