165k views
4 votes
Sequoia's opportunity cost of producing 1 pair of shorts is of almonds, and Glacier's opportunity cost of producing 1 pair of shorts is of almonds. Therefore, has a comparative advantage in the production of shorts, and has a comparative advantage in the production of almonds.

User Barryku
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Sequoia has a comparative advantage in the production of shorts, and Glacier has a comparative advantage in the production of almonds.

Step-by-step explanation:

Comparative advantage is the ability of a country, company, or individual to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than others. In this case, Sequoia has a comparative advantage in the production of shorts because its opportunity cost of producing 1 pair of shorts is lower than Glacier's opportunity cost. Conversely, Glacier has a comparative advantage in the production of almonds because its opportunity cost of producing 1 pair of shorts is lower than Sequoia's opportunity cost of producing almonds.

User The Zach Man
by
8.2k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.