Final answer:
The statement that you should not share your interview report with those that you interviewed unless directed by the lead analyst is true, as it helps to prevent scope creep and requirement changes. Ethical integrity and professional conduct are essential in project management to ensure unbiased and accurate data.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement is true: Unless ordered by the lead analyst for a project, you should not share your interview report with those that you interviewed. Doing so can indeed lead to scope creep and changes in the requirements. Sharing preliminary results or report contents can result in the interviewees attempting to influence the outcome of the report, thus affecting the integrity of the project and potentially the project scope. This principle is part of maintaining professional conduct and project management best practices to ensure that the data remains accurate and unbiased and that the project objectives are met without unnecessary expansion.
As illustrated in the Mini-Case Study, ethical difficulties can arise in projects, such as the attempted manipulation of data in a report. It is essential to adhere to ethical guidelines and maintain the integrity of the evaluation process, irrespective of internal pressures to alter reports to make the project appear more positive than the data suggests.
Furthermore, the case also highlights that it is never acceptable to fabricate or alter data. The evaluator's stance in the scenario is a testament to upholding the independence of the evaluation process and resisting unethical practices, which is crucial in the field of business, particularly within project management and data analysis.