Final answer:
The statement is false; Type-1 hypervisors are considered more secure than Type-2 hypervisors because they have a smaller attack surface and do not depend on an underlying operating system, making them less susceptible to security breaches.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement is false. Type-1 hypervisors are considered to be more secure than Type-2 hypervisors. A Type-1 hypervisor, also known as a bare-metal hypervisor, runs directly on the host's hardware to control the hardware and to manage guest operating systems. In contrast, a Type-2 hypervisor runs on a conventional operating system just like other computer programs.
One of the main reasons Type-1 hypervisors are deemed more secure is that they have a smaller attack surface. Since they run directly on hardware and do not depend on an underlying operating system, there are fewer layers that can be exploited by attackers. Furthermore, Type-1 hypervisors are often used in environments where security and performance are critical, such as data centers and enterprise scenarios.
On the other hand, Type-2 hypervisors are more susceptible to security breaches as they inherit the security weaknesses of the underlying operating system. Any vulnerabilities in the host OS can potentially be exploited to compromise the hosted virtual machines.