Final answer:
The incorrect statement not aligned with the postulates of special relativity is that an object's length appears to increase when viewed by a stationary observer as it approaches the speed of light. In reality, special relativity predicts length contraction, not expansion.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that is NOT a consequence of the postulates of special relativity is:
D) When the speed of an object approaches the speed of light, its length appears to increase when viewed by a stationary observer.
This is incorrect because, according to the postulates of special relativity, an object in motion relative to an observer experiences length contraction, not expansion. The proper length of an object is the length measured by an observer moving with the object, and this length is always greater than the length measured by an observer in relative motion to the object at high speeds. Additionally, concerning the wavelength of light, there is a redshift or blueshift for light from a source that is moving away from or towards an observer, respectively, known as the Doppler effect for light.