Final answer:
Participatory evaluation emphasizes community member empowerment and ownership, encouraging creativity and providing organizers community insight. It contrasts with dependency on outside experts, which goes against its principles of internal capacity building. This evaluation approach aligns with the transformative participatory model, focusing on mutual learning and critical reflection.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question relates to an exception within the rationale for using participatory evaluation, which does not align with its principles. One of the key aspects of participatory evaluation is to encourage community members to take ownership of the projects they are involved in and to engage creatively in the process. It also provides valuable perspectives for organizers on the community's response to their programs. However, unlike the other reasons presented, urging members to depend on outside experts goes against the ethos of participatory evaluation, which emphasizes on empowerment and developing internal capacities rather than reliance on external authorities.
Participatory evaluation is an approach that fits well with initiatives that value consumer choice and desire to include client feedback into the program model. The transformative participatory evaluation (T-PE) specifically aims to empower individuals who have traditionally had limited access to power, providing them with a platform to enhance their influence and participation in community decisions and programs.
Through buy-in and mutual learning, the participatory evaluation process becomes an informative and educational experience for all parties involved. It also addresses adult education methods that promote critical reflection instead of passive reception of expert-identified solutions. This encourages an asset-based community development approach, where the community values, good practices, and feedback are central to the evaluation process and program improvements.