Question

Which of the following claims are true for a depiction of a cat but not for a description of a cat?

a. properties strongly associated with the cat (whiskers) will be particularly prominent
b. the distinctive features of the cat (claws) will be particularly prominent
c. aspects of the cat that are obvious (fact that the cat has a body) are likely not to be prominent
d. the cat's head will probably be prominent, but the cat's claws are likely not to be

Answer 1

A depiction of a cat emphasizes visual traits like whiskers and head size, while a description might focus on sensory or motion details like the sound of a meow. In depictions, prominent features are often exaggerated, and while a cat's head might be featured significantly, its claws may not be unless pertinent to the depictions' action.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question you're asking is about how to differentiate between a depiction and a description of a cat. The main answer is that a depiction, such as a drawing or photo, is likely to emphasize visually prominent features like whiskers or head size, whereas a written description can highlight aspects like the sound of its meow or the texture of its fur. The explanation is that in visual arts, some features are exaggerated for emphasis or recognition, whereas in text, authors often provide details that engage sensory perception or motion which cannot be visually represented.The properties of a cat like whiskers might be prominent in a depiction, while a description could highlight less obvious qualities. Depictions tend to focus on the distinct visual aspects such as the eyes or fur pattern. However, this does not mean that aspects like the fact that a cat has a body will not be prominent - it's just that it is so obvious it might not be the focus. Furthermore, while the cat's head might be prominent in a depiction due to our tendency to recognize and focus on faces, the claws might not be unless they are relevant to the action being depicted, such as climbing or scratching.