Final answer:
The statement about qualitative research facing controversy due to limited terminology is false; the actual controversy stems from the challenges of handling and organizing subjective, non-standardized data.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that a major controversy involving qualitative research is that a relatively small amount of terminology is used is False. A characteristic challenge in qualitative research is not the lack of terminology, but rather the handling of a wide range of subjective data and the difficulty of organizing and tabulating this data due to its non-standardized nature. Qualitative research focuses on obtaining deep insights and understanding the complexities of human behavior and societal issues, often yielding a rich array of perspectives that cannot be easily quantified.
Qualitative information is valuable for exploring topics that cannot be observed directly or that involve internal thought processes, such as opinions, beliefs, and motivations. Researchers conducting qualitative studies may utilize methods such as interviews, case studies, and observations to collect in-depth responses and narratives that provide profound understanding but are challenging to replicate and generalize.
Therefore, the controversy tied to qualitative research often concerns its subjective and interpretative aspects, along with dilemmas in validity, reliability, and generalizability. The capacity to derive meaning from the vast array of terms and experiences, rather than a scarcity of terms, stands at the heart of debates surrounding qualitative methodologies.