133k views
3 votes
Which Supreme Court case involving an Ohio wheat farmer who grew more wheat than was allowed by Depression-era limits to keep prices low, ended up dramatically expanding the permissible use of the commerce clause

User Smellerbee
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the permissible use of the commerce clause is Wickard v. Filburn (1942), in which the court ruled that even personal wheat production could be regulated under the commerce clause.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Supreme Court case involving an Ohio wheat farmer who grew more wheat than was allowed by Depression-era limits to keep prices low, dramatically expanding the permissible use of the commerce clause, is Wickard v. Filburn (1942).

In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that even if the wheat produced by Roscoe Filburn was intended for personal use and not for sale, it still had a substantial effect on interstate commerce. The court held that Congress had the power to regulate Filburn's wheat production under the commerce clause of the Constitution.

This expanded interpretation of the commerce clause paved the way for the federal government's increased regulation of economic activities that have even a slight impact on interstate commerce.

User Tarum
by
7.1k points