Final Answer:
In contrast with b. the elite perspective, the pluralist perspective denies that power is concentrated in the hands of a few in democratic societies. Instead, it holds that many groups vie for power, with no group dominating.option.b
Step-by-step explanation:
The elite perspective (Option b) posits a concentrated form of power where a small, privileged group controls key resources and institutions, shaping societal outcomes.
This viewpoint suggests a hierarchical structure in which a select few wield significant influence over decision-making processes. In contrast, the pluralist perspective (Option b) contends that power is dispersed among various interest groups, preventing any single entity from monopolizing control.
Pluralism asserts that democratic societies thrive on the competition of diverse groups, each advocating for its interests, resulting in a more balanced distribution of power.
The elite perspective's foundation lies in the idea that a ruling class dictates societal directions, while the pluralist perspective emphasizes the decentralized nature of power dynamics.
Pluralism recognizes the existence of multiple stakeholders, fostering a system where different groups engage in a democratic exchange of ideas and interests.
The choice "b. the elite perspective, the pluralist perspective" accurately captures this ideological divergence in understanding the distribution of power within democratic societies.