Final answer:
A competition conflict resolution style is suited for insignificant issues or when a quick, decisive action is needed, such as implementing an unpopular decision.
Step-by-step explanation:
A competition conflict resolution style is ideal for trivial issues, speedy decisions, or an unpopular course of action.
The various styles of conflict resolution include collaboration, accommodation, competition, and avoidance, each being applicable to different scenarios.
In a situation requiring a quick decision or when dealing with matters of little importance, a competitive approach may be expedient.
Similarly, when a decision is likely to be contentious or unpopular, taking a competitive stance can help in decisively implementing the course of action, although it may not be the most cooperative approach.
Regarding collective decision-making, there tends to be a bias towards the status quo, as changing established procedures or policies often requires a significant push or agreement which is not always readily available or achievable.
When discussing intergroup relations, the one displaying the least tolerance is segregation. This form of interaction explicitly involves keeping groups apart, often leading to entrenched disparities and inequalities.
The metaphor of the 'salad bowl' is used to describe pluralism, wherein various groups within a society maintain their distinct cultural identities while coexisting with one another, as opposed to assimilation where differences are minimized as groups converge culturally.
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act fights against theories of conflict, as it seeks to prevent discrimination against older individuals, ensuring they have the same opportunities and are not unfairly excluded from the workforce.
To address the tragedy of the commons, one effective technique is preventing free riding, which occurs when some individuals consume more than their fair share of a resource, or do not pay for the resource, leaving less for others.
When a challenge occurs where people or groups divide between two extremes on an issue, this is known as polarization. It can inhibit constructive dialogue and lead to an increased sense of division within a society.
According to Karl Marx, social structures evolve through conflict. He believed that societal change is driven by the clash between different classes and their interests.