Final answer:
A forensic accountant uses both inductive and deductive reasoning when arriving at a conclusion based on the evidence gathered.
Step-by-step explanation:
True
A forensic accountant, when arriving at a conclusion, uses both inductive and deductive reasoning based on the evidence gathered. Inductive reasoning involves using specific observations to arrive at a general conclusion, while deductive reasoning starts with a general theory or premise and arrives at a specific conclusion based on observations or evidence. Therefore, the statement in the question is true.