73.5k views
0 votes
YOU: Hey Diana, what's up? Why are you so happy?

DIANA: Did you see the chore list for this week? All I have to do is shred paper. You have to rake leaves all week! It's an ideal world!
YOU: What's so good about shredding paper?
TINA: Are you kidding? I get to stay inside, and my job will take an hour at the most. You'll have to be outside raking for at least two or three hours two or three times during the week.
A. Job rotation
B. Job enrichment
C. Job enlargement
D. Job simplification

User Kryptonian
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

To maximize efficiency and free time, one should allocate household chores based on individual strengths, but this must be balanced with fairness to maintain harmony and prevent conflict among roommates.

Step-by-step explanation:

Optimal Task Allocation for Efficiency

If you find yourself significantly faster at certain tasks than your roommates, it would be wise to allocate tasks based on individual strengths to maximize efficiency and free time. In your case, being 70% faster at doing dishes suggests that you should take on this task to reduce the total time spent on chores. Meanwhile, a 10% difference in vacuuming speed is less significant; thus, assigning this to a roommate might be beneficial to even out the workload.

Problems might arise due to the uneven cleaning speeds. If you consistently finish tasks much faster, resentment might grow, or you might find yourself expected to take on more work because of your efficiency. A trade-related analogy is that of a worker in a factory who is much more efficient than their peers; they might produce more in less time, which could lead to unfair expectations or imbalance in the division of labor.

It's essential to have a balanced approach to task allocation where efficiency is coupled with fairness to prevent potential conflicts and maintain a harmonious living environment. Regular communication with your roommates about the division of chores can help manage expectations and responsibilities.

User Rob Wagner
by
7.5k points