Final answer:
Dispossession implies a selfish attitude by taking from others, which can be seen historically in U.S. Indian policy, proprietary colonies, and the sharecropping system.
Step-by-step explanation:
The act of dispossession often reflects a selfish approach as it involves taking possessions from others, demonstrating a focus on personal gain rather than mutual benefit. This notion is relevant to certain historical contexts, for example:
- Acquisition of land was indeed a significant motivating factor in the development of early U.S. Indian policy, which often resulted in the dispossession of Native American lands.
- In a proprietary colony, the notion that Proprietors only had the responsibility to collect profits is false, as they also had to manage the colony and its affairs.
- Sharecroppers were tenant farmers who indeed paid their rent with a portion of their crops, which signifies a form of economic dispossession as it often left them with little to no profit after settling their dues.