Final answer:
True, Paul's writings offer a different account of the Eucharist than the synoptic gospels, reflecting early Christian diversity in the understanding of this sacrament.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Paul's account of the Eucharist differs from those recorded in the synoptic gospels is true. Paul's writings, which predate the synoptic gospels, are considered by scholars to reflect the earliest written account of the Last Supper and offer a theological interpretation aligning with his mission.
The synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) also record the institution of the Eucharist, but with different emphasis and narrative details. For instance, Paul emphasizes the communal aspect and the remembrance of Jesus' death, while the synoptic gospels focus on the establishment of the New Covenant through Jesus' blood.
Moreover, the practice and understanding of the Eucharist evolved, reflected in varying Christian sects that might have included different rituals, such as using water instead of wine, suggesting an ongoing interpretation of the Eucharist's meaning.