Final Answer:
The given statement Intentional causality implies that something has to happen to us first in order to receive grace, whereas instrumental causality does not is b) False.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement is false because the relationship between intentional causality and grace is misunderstood. Intentional causality does not require something to happen to us first in order to receive grace; rather, intentional causality suggests that an intentional act or decision on our part is involved in receiving grace.
In contrast, instrumental causality involves the use of instruments or means for a desired outcome. In the context of grace, intentional causality emphasizes our conscious choices or intentions in aligning with grace, while instrumental causality focuses on the means or instruments used to facilitate that alignment.
In theological terms, intentional causality implies a personal and intentional engagement with grace, recognizing our role in opening ourselves to its influence. It emphasizes our conscious decisions and choices, highlighting the active participation of the individual in the process of receiving grace.
Understanding this distinction is crucial for a nuanced comprehension of the dynamics between intentional causality, instrumental causality, and the reception of grace in theological and philosophical discussions. Therefore, the correct understanding is that intentional causality involves a purposeful engagement, not a prerequisite event.