Final answer:
The statement is false as computer-based medical records do have disadvantages such as system failures, data breaches, and high costs, in addition to the benefits they offer over paper-based records.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the computer-based medical record has no disadvantages, whereas the paper-based record has numerous disadvantages is false. While computer-based medical records, also known as electronic health records (EHRs), have several advantages over paper-based records, they also come with their own set of disadvantages. EHRs can improve accessibility and provide better data management, but issues such as system failures, data breaches, and high implementation costs cannot be overlooked.
Electronic health records offer numerous benefits that include improved patient care, increased efficiency, and better data tracking capabilities. However, the paper-based system's disadvantages, which may involve accessibility problems, difficulty in sharing records, and the physical space required for storage, are well-acknowledged.
Moreover, transitioning from paper records to digital ones can be a challenging process for many healthcare providers, and the cost associated with it is significant. Additionally, other drawbacks of EHRs include the need for continuous technical support, potential for software/hardware issues, and required training for staff.