224k views
2 votes
Sarah owns a new company. New companies are more likely to fail than well-established companies. Therefore:

Sarah's company is more likely to fail than a well-established company.
A.Conclusion Follows
B.Conclusion Does Not Follow

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The conclusion follows. Sarah's company is more likely to fail than a well-established company.

Step-by-step explanation:

The conclusion follows. The statement establishes a general principle that new companies are more likely to fail than well-established companies. Based on this principle, it can be logically inferred that Sarah's company, being new, is also more likely to fail compared to a well-established company. Therefore, the conclusion that Sarah's company is more likely to fail than a well-established company follows.

User Anubian Noob
by
7.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories