Final answer:
The conclusion 'Some noisy plastic bags are reusable' does not logically follow from the given premises. Plastic bags contribute significantly to environmental issues, and the recycling of plastics is currently inefficient with most ending up in landfills, underscoring the importance of sustainable alternatives. The correct option is b.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question deals with the logical deduction of whether the statement 'Some noisy plastic bags are reusable' follows from the premises 'All plastic bags make noise' and 'Not all plastic bags are reusable'. Making noise is a trait of all plastic bags, yet not all possess the attribute of being reusable.
From these premises, we cannot definitively conclude that some noisy plastic bags are reusable because there could be a possibility that all noisy (which is all) plastic bags are not reusable. Therefore, the conclusion does not follow from the premises.
When reflecting on the environmental impact of plastic bags, it's important to recognize that plastics significantly contribute to landfill waste and global carbon emissions, with plastic waste being a considerable problem.
The statistics regarding the recycling of plastics indicate inefficiency; only a small percentage of plastics are successfully recycled, leaving a majority to accumulate in landfills. Realizing the environmental harm caused by single-use plastics can influence consumer behavior to opt for more sustainable choices, like using reusable alternatives.
In the broader context, recycling programs are gaining traction as a way to mitigate environmental contamination from plastics.
However, widespread plastic usage contributes to ongoing issues, such as increased energy and resource utilization, as well as being a threat to wildlife, highlighting the need for more effective waste management and alternatives to plastic use. The correct option is b.