Final answer:
increasing resources and creating precise rules are not ways to increase conflict. Typically, conflict arises from scarcity and competition, and precise rules could reduce ambiguity, potentially diminishing conflict.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that increasing resources and creating more precise rules for the allocation of those resources represent two ways to increase conflict . Typically, conflicts arise when there is a scarcity of resources and competition for their allocation, not an increase in resources. More precise rules could potentially reduce conflict by clarifying entitlements and reducing ambiguity which might otherwise lead to disputes.
In political science, actors often engage in bargaining to address disagreements over resource allocation. Conflict theory, on the other hand, explains how inequality is created and maintained, particularly when powerful groups exploit resources at the expense of less powerful ones. A conflict theorist might argue that this exploitation leads to conflict, not the precise allocation itself.
Moreover, G. William Domhoff's Who Rules America? and the conflict perspective suggest that wealth is necessary for exerting influence over social and political systems, indicating that conflict often stems from unequal power dynamics rather than the mere distribution of resources or establishment of rules.