Final answer:
The statement about Expectancy Theory in the question is false; performance-to-outcome expectancy refers to an individual's belief that their performance will lead to a particular outcome, not the level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with that outcome.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement offered in the question concerning Expectancy Theory is in fact false. The concept mentioned, the 'performance-to-outcome expectancy,' does not pertain to the anticipated satisfaction or dissatisfaction with an outcome. Instead, it refers to an individual's belief regarding the likelihood that their effort will lead to a certain level of performance. This belief is part of the broader Expectancy Theory of motivation, which suggests that individuals are motivated to act when they expect that their actions will lead to outcomes they value.
The Expectancy Theory comprises three components:
- Expectancy or Effort-Performance (E-P) Expectancy: The belief that one's effort will result in desired performance.
- Instrumentality or Performance-Outcome (P-O) Expectancy: The belief that a given level of performance will lead to a specific outcome.
- Valence: The value an individual places on the outcomes, which could be positive or negative.
Therefore, the performance-to-outcome expectancy deals with the perceived relationship between performance and the outcome, not solely the satisfaction from the outcome.