Final answer:
Mandating jury trials for all criminal cases would stress the judicial system, potentially delay the right to a speedy trial, and require a larger pool of jurors with increased logistical challenges and costs.
Step-by-step explanation:
If all criminal cases were subject to jury trials, several impacts would be observed across the judicial system. Firstly, the right to a speedy and public trial could be compromised due to the increased number of trials requiring jury selection, which is a time-consuming process. The Sixth Amendment ensures this right, emphasizing the importance of a timely trial.
Secondly, the existing legal framework, based on the Sixth and Seventh Amendments and various Supreme Court rulings, indicates that a trial by jury is a critical component of American liberty. It protects against potential tyranny by ensuring that peers, rather than a single judge, determine the legality of cases. Therefore, mandating jury trials for all criminal cases would resonate with the framers' intentions but might also stress the judicial system.
Last, the requirement for impartial juries in every case would necessitate a larger pool of jurors, which could create logistical challenges and increase costs for the court system. While the goal of having a fair and unbiased decision-maker is paramount, there might be practical limitations to implementing this approach universally.