Question

Which of the following statements accurately describes why the theory of strict liability was developed?

A. Manufacturers are assumed to have a selfish intent because of the capital market.

B. Sometimes it cannot be proven which manufacturer was responsible for the harm caused by a defective product, or a part related to the product.

C. Manufacturers can bear the costs of the damages resulting from their products better than an individual consumer.

D. Manufacturers should be punished for producing unsafe products.

Answer 1

Strict liability was developed to ensure that manufacturers, who can better absorb the costs of damages from defective products, assume responsibility for any harm caused, thereby protecting consumers and encouraging the production of safer products.

Step-by-step explanation:

The theory of strict liability was developed for several reasons, one of which is described by the statement C: Manufacturers can bear the costs of the damages resulting from their products better than an individual consumer.

This principle is founded on the belief that corporations, due to their larger scale and resources, are better positioned to absorb the financial impact of compensating for damages caused by defective products.

Strict liability does not require proof of negligence or malicious intent, only that the product was defective and caused harm.

This legal theory ensures protection for consumers and incentivizes manufacturers to produce safe products by shifting the responsibility to remedy any harm caused by their products, as they are deemed to have a broader capacity to manage these costs.