Final answer:
Reporting is not limited to just observer-reported and media reporting; it includes diverse forms such as objective and interpretive reporting, investigative journalism, and citizen journalism. The history of reporting shows a shift from biased and sensationalist journalism to more fact-based and analytical approaches, influenced by media bias and consumer preferences. This understanding is crucial for comprehending how public perception and societal perspectives are shaped by the media.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that there are only two types of reporting isolating events, namely observer-reported and media reporting, does not encompass the diverse landscape of reporting. There are, in fact, various forms of reporting that have evolved over time.
These range from traditional journalism, which includes both objective reporting and interpretive reporting, to more modern forms such as investigative journalism, and citizen journalism which often surfaces during significant events like natural disasters or social unrest.
Additionally, the coverage of scientific research by the media, particularly frontier science, plays a vital role in shaping public perception. The mention of partisan journalism and yellow journalism indicates the historical context of biased and sensationalist reporting.
In contrast, objective journalism emerged in the early 20th century, with a commitment to fact-reporting. The landscape of reporting is further complicated by the bias in media, the strategic use of media events by politicians, and a shift from mass broadcasting to narrowcasting, signaling a move to more personalized news consumption methods.
Understanding the various approaches to reporting is crucial as it impacts the information received and processed by the public, shaping societal perspectives and understanding of world events.