Final answer:
For first-time minor violations, non-monetary penalties such as educational interventions or discipline within academic settings are common. The legal system, as seen in cases like 'Miller v. Alabama' and 'Graham v. Florida', highlights the importance of avoiding extreme penalties, especially for juveniles, and instead focusing on rehabilitative justice.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering punishments for violating norms, especially for first-time minor violations that do not involve serious crimes such as those involving the destruction or theft of property, or use force or threat thereof, there are various non-monetary penalties that can be imposed. An example is a scenario where a student commits plagiarism by copying text from an Internet site without proper citation. Although considered a serious academic offense, the punishment might not always include a fine. Instead, educational institutions may opt for other forms of disciplinary action such as writing an apology letter, attending a workshop on academic integrity, or receiving a failing grade for the assignment.
The legal system also recognizes the need for proportionality in sentencing, especially when dealing with juvenile offenders. Cases like Miller v. Alabama and Graham v. Florida highlight the Supreme Court's stance against extreme sentences, such as life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, for juveniles. These decisions reinforce the idea that punishments should aim at rehabilitation rather than just penalization, particularly for those under a certain age and for non-homicide offenses.