Final answer:
Although job satisfaction is not directly linked to ergonomic injuries in the provided information, dangerous working conditions and physically demanding jobs are established as predictors of worker disability. Dissatisfaction may indirectly affect injury risk through decreased engagement and safety practices. The nature of work and local economic diversity are significant in evaluating injury and disability risks.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'per Pendy, a person who doesn't like their job is more likely to suffer an ergonomic injury' touches on the intersection of occupational health and workplace satisfaction. While the connection between job satisfaction and the likelihood of ergonomic injuries isn't directly addressed by the information provided, it is a reasonable hypothesis that disliking a job could lead to less engagement, potentially increasing the risk for injury.
However, the provided information does establish that unnaturally repetitive physical activity, unhealthy lifestyles, dangerous working conditions, and risky cultural behaviors contribute to higher disability rates and dependence on government support, particularly in areas with physically demanding jobs and a lack of economic diversity.
Conditions like these prevalent in jobs such as mining and factory work are well-known predictors of worker disability because of their physical demands and associated hazards.
Therefore, while job dissatisfaction might indirectly increase the likelihood of an injury, the given information underlines that the nature of the work and the economic situation of the region are significant factors in predicting ergonomic injuries and disabilities.