Final Answer:
The major disadvantage of allowing every citizen to participate in lawmaking is the potential for inefficiency and lack of expertise. Not every individual possesses the necessary knowledge, understanding, or time to thoroughly assess complex legal matters, leading to the creation of poorly designed or impractical laws.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering the idea of involving every citizen in lawmaking, it's important to acknowledge that while inclusivity is crucial in a democratic society, efficiency and expertise also play pivotal roles. Every citizen may not possess the required expertise in law, policy analysis, or the complexities of governance. Complex legal matters often demand specialized knowledge and experience, which may not be widely accessible among the general populace. This could result in the formulation of laws that lack depth, feasibility, or even contradict established legal principles.
Moreover, the process of involving every citizen in lawmaking can lead to logistical challenges. With a large and diverse population, reaching consensus on various issues becomes arduous. Decision-making processes might become cumbersome and time-consuming, hindering the prompt enactment of necessary laws. Furthermore, it's important to consider that citizens might not have sufficient time or resources to fully engage in the legislative process, potentially leading to hasty or uninformed decisions.
While inclusivity and citizen participation are fundamental to a democratic society, it's equally important to strike a balance between representation and efficiency in lawmaking. Expertise and specialized knowledge play critical roles in crafting effective and feasible laws, and a system that takes into account the views of citizens while also incorporating expert insights is essential for a well-functioning legislative process.