Final answer:
For transporting dilute sulfuric acid, tin (Sn) would be a suitable metal due to its resistance to corrosion by the acid and relative safety compared to lead (Pb). However, in industrial applications, non-metallic materials are often used to avoid metallic corrosion altogether.
Step-by-step explanation:
When manufacturing and supplying dilute sulfuric acid, one must consider the reactivity of sulfuric acid with different metals. Of the given options (Fe, Al, Cu, Zn, Pb, Sn, Mg, Ag), the best choices for moving sulfuric acid would be those that are least reactive with the acid. Taking into account the principles of galvanization, coating with zinc (Zn) can prevent corrosion of iron or steel, suggesting that Zn could be a good choice. However, Zn has a reaction with dilute sulfuric acid; therefore, it would not be suitable for storing or moving sulfuric acid. Since lead (Pb) and tin (Sn) do not react as vigorously with dilute sulfuric acid, they could be considered more suitable for this purpose. However, due to the toxicity of lead, tin would be a safer choice for the environment and for health reasons.
Metal containers made from tin are corrosion-resistant and would therefore be appropriate for transporting dilute sulfuric acid. It is worth noting that in industrial applications, plastics or other non-metallic materials are often preferred for storing and transporting sulfuric acid due to their high resistance to corrosion.