Final answer:
Oedipus provides evidence against Teiresias by accusing him of being a blind man, highlighting his past accuracy, and suggesting he may have a personal motive.
Step-by-step explanation:
Oedipus provides several pieces of evidence to support his argument against Teiresias. Firstly, he accuses Teiresias of being a blind man who cannot see the truth. Oedipus believes that Teiresias is hiding information that could help solve the mystery of the previous king's murder and end the plague in Thebes. Secondly, Oedipus points to Teiresias' past accuracy in predicting other events as evidence of his ability to know the truth. Oedipus argues that if Teiresias was able to accurately predict other events, then he should also have knowledge of the killer's identity. Lastly, Oedipus believes that Teiresias may have a personal motive for not revealing the truth, suggesting that he may have been involved in the crime himself.