Question

Which of the following represents a limitation of a Supreme Court-focused strategy to the advancement of civil rights?

a) The Supreme Court has generally been reluctant to hear cases
involving civil rights issues.

b) The Supreme Court can only be called into session by Congress, and
this occurs infrequently.

c) Supreme Court decisions are not self-enforcing, so the Court must
rely on others to carry out its decisions.

d) The Supreme Court generally does not have jurisdiction over civil
rights cases, so it would require an expansion of the Court's authority
to act.

Answer 1

The main limitation of a Supreme Court-focused strategy in advancing civil rights is that Supreme Court decisions require implementation by other branches of government, as these decisions are not self-enforcing. (option c)

Step-by-step explanation:

The limitation of a Supreme Court-focused strategy to the advancement of civil rights is that Supreme Court decisions are not self-enforcing, meaning the Court must rely on other entities to execute its decisions. This limitation is encapsulated in option (c) of the provided question. The Court cannot initiate its own cases; it only reviews them from lower courts. Once a decision is made, it is incumbent upon the executive and legislative branches to ensure that the ruling is implemented and followed through. Therefore, the Court's influence on civil rights is significant but depends on the cooperation of other governmental branches for the enforcement of its rulings.