Final answer:
The impact of government policy on restoring natural output levels may be delayed due to the long time lags associated with implementing fiscal policy, whereas monetary policy usually has shorter time lags and can respond more swiftly to changes in consumer confidence and spending.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question deals with the concept of time lags associated with the implementation of monetary and fiscal policy. Specifically, it refers to the time it takes for a policy's effects to be fully realized in the economy. When consumer confidence increases and consumer spending rises, the impact of government policies aimed at restoring natural output levels will likely be influenced by time lags. Discretionary fiscal policy often has longer time lags due to the recognition lag (time to realize an economic downturn), legislative lag (time for bills to be debated and passed), and implementation lag (time for the funds to be disbursed and programs to start).
For instance, fiscal policy takes effect through government spending and taxation, which often involve complex negotiations and legal procedures, leading to a delay in their influence on the economy. Conversely, monetary policy, guided by the central bank, usually has shorter time lags. This includes open market operations that the Federal Reserve can quickly initiate, as well as changes in interest rates which can take effect relatively quickly.