Question

The Middle East dispute is a multi-state one since not only Israel and Jordan have attempted to control the Jordan river, but other parties, such as Syria and the Palestinians, have also taken part in trying to control sections of the river. Israeli and Jordanian attempts to control the river were illustrated by several constructions such as the King Talal dam, built by the Jordanians, and the National Water Carrier, built by the Israelis. These attempts led to reactions that often were followed by militant attacks. According to the text, what can be inferred about political borders? ​

Answer 1

Political borders can lead to disputes when tied to resource control, as seen in Middle East and South Asian water rights conflicts over the Jordan River and Indus River, involving multiple countries.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the text, political borders in regions such as the Middle East and South Asia can be highly contentious, especially when they pertain to the control and management of essential resources like water. The dispute over the Jordan River involving multiple states including Israel, Jordan, Syria, and the Palestinians, where attempts to control the river have led to political tension and conflict, as well as constructions like the King Talal Dam and the National Water Carrier, highlights the significance of water as a geopolitical resource. Similar issues of water rights and border disputes can be seen in the conflict over Kashmir between India and Pakistan, where control of the Indus River is a critical factor for survival.