The creature's actions in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein can be seen as a response to his abandonment, but his behavior cannot be entirely excused. He had alternative choices and options he could have pursued instead of resorting to violence.
The creature in the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley can be seen as taking violent and vengeful/cruel acts because he was abandoned by his creator and mankind. However, it is important to note that justification is subjective and can vary depending on one's perspective. From the creature's point of view, his actions may be seen as a response to the rejection and mistreatment he experienced.
While the creature's actions can be understood in the context of his abandonment, it is also worth exploring the alternative choices and options he had. Instead of resorting to violence, the creature could have sought understanding and acceptance from others, or tried to communicate with his creator to address his grievances.
Ultimately, the creature's behavior cannot be entirely excused. Although he suffered greatly, he still had control over his actions and had the capacity to make different choices. While his circumstances may have influenced his behavior, his actions still caused harm to innocent individuals.
The probable question may be from the passage "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley