Final answer:
The author's point of view in the excerpt suggests support for the Missouri Compromise, an act of Congress intended to maintain the balance between free and slave states while allowing slavery south of latitude 36° 30' with exceptions and ensuring escaped slaves could be reclaimed by their owners.
Step-by-step explanation:
The excerpt in question presents a point of view deeply rooted in the historical context of the Missouri Compromise. This piece of legislation is a reflection of the delicate balance attempted by the U.S. Congress in response to the contentious issue of slavery within the newly acquired Louisiana Territory. The authors of this legislation aimed to maintain the balance of power between slaveholding states and free states by allowing slavery south of the 36° 30' latitude, with the significant exception of Missouri, and prohibiting it to the north of this line.
Furthermore, the provision included a safeguard for slave owners, whereby escaped slaves could be reclaimed even in areas where slavery was banned. This clause mirrors the language in Article IV, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which stipulated that fugitive slaves must be returned to their owners. Meanwhile, Section 2 of the Thirteenth Amendment later granted Congress the power to enforce the abolition of slavery through appropriate legislation, marking a significant departure from the original compromise.