Answer:
**Randomized Comparative Approach:**
1. **Design:**
- **Randomly assign patients to two groups:**
- Group 1 (Brand A): Patients receive eye drops from Brand A.
- Group 2 (Brand B): Patients receive eye drops from Brand B (common brand).
2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
- After the initial analysis, further investigate the effects on near-sighted and far-sighted individuals separately.
3. **Diagram:**
```
---------------------------------
| Randomized |
| Comparative |
---------------------------------
| Group 1 |
| Brand A |
---------------------------------
| Group 2 |
| Brand B |
---------------------------------
```
**Matched Pairs Design:**
1. **Design:**
- **Pairing:**
- Pair each patient with a near-sighted individual and a far-sighted individual based on similar characteristics (e.g., age, initial vision score).
- Each pair consists of a near-sighted and a far-sighted individual.
- **Treatment Assignment:**
- Randomly assign one individual from each pair to receive Brand A.
- The other individual from the same pair receives Brand B.
2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
- Analyze results separately for near-sighted and far-sighted individuals.
3. **Diagram:**
```
---------------------------------
| Matched Pairs |
| Design |
---------------------------------
| Near-sighted | Far-sighted |
---------------------------------
| Brand A | Brand B |
---------------------------------
| Brand B | Brand A |
---------------------------------
```
Both designs allow for a comparison of the effects of Brand A and Brand B on vision test performance. The randomized comparative approach provides a straightforward comparison, while the matched pairs design controls for individual variability by pairing near-sighted and far-sighted patients.