162k views
5 votes
Is 16:8 equivalent to 2:1

User Diansheng
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The ratio 16:8 is equivalent to 2:1 because both numbers in the ratio can be divided by 8. This is similar to how 22:11:22 simplifies to 2:1:2. To find unknown actual sizes from scale models, we set up proportions and solve for the unknown variables.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question asks if the ratio 16:8 is equivalent to 2:1. To determine this, we can simplify the first ratio by dividing both parts by 8, which gives us 2:1, confirming that 16:8 is indeed equivalent to 2:1. Similarly, 22:11:22 simplifies to 2:1:2 because each term in the ratio can be divided by 11.

To explore the concept further with larger numbers, we use proportion. For example, if we had a scale model with a scale length (Length-scale) of 8 units and wanted to find the actual length (w) of the display, given that scale/actual is 1/160, we would set up the proportion 8/w = 1/160 and solve for w. Similarly, if the ratio of the width's scale to actual size is 4 to 1, we would have Width-scale/actual = 4/1.

To solve this, we write another proportion. If the only unit given is feet, our proportion might look like 1/48 = w/16, which we can solve to find the unknown width w in feet.

User Louis
by
7.7k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories