189k views
3 votes
What is an example of an assumption you might make if you are arguing that universal helmet laws should be created and enforced in all states?

a) All motorcycle riders prefer wearing helmets for safety.
b) Helmet use has no impact on accident prevention.
c) People are generally opposed to government regulations.
d) Universal helmet laws are already effective in all states.

User Rising Lee
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

An assumption that could be made when arguing for universal helmet laws is that a. all motorcycle riders prefer wearing helmets for safety.

Step-by-step explanation:

An assumption that could be made when arguing for universal helmet laws is, All motorcycle riders prefer wearing helmets for safety. This assumption implies that most if not all motorcycle riders recognize the importance of wearing helmets to protect themselves in the event of an accident. It assumes that universal helmet laws would be widely supported by the motorcycle-riding community. This assumption supports the argument for creating and enforcing helmet laws to ensure the safety of all riders.

User Mitul Marsoniya
by
8.0k points