Question

Read 'disarming the great affordable housing debate' and delineate and evaluate its argument. Write a well-developed response explaining the following: 1) What is the author's and tuner's perspective, position, and major claims in 'disarming the great affordable housing debate'? 2) How is the authors' argument a response to Edsall's 'where should a poor family live?' 3) How do Greene and Turner present counterclaims to opposing positions, information, and claims? 4) How do Edsall, as well as Greene and Turner, use rhetorical devices in their respective arguments to support their claims? 5) Do you believe 'disarming the great affordable housing debate' is a convincing argument? Provide your evaluation of it.

Answer 1

1.The author's perspective in 'Disarming the Great Affordable Housing Debate' is that affordable housing is a critical issue.

2.The author acknowledges Edsall's argument that there can be negative effects on neighborhoods with an influx of low-income housing but counters by highlighting the benefits of diverse communities.

3. Greene and Turner present counterclaims to opposing positions by acknowledging the concerns and arguments made by those who oppose affordable housing initiatives.

4. Edsall appeals to logic and reason by presenting data and analysis, while Greene and Turner use emotional appeals to create a sense of empathy and urgency.

5. Disarming the Great Affordable Housing Debate' is a convincing argument as it presents a thoughtful analysis of the issue and provides practical solutions.

Step-by-step explanation:

The author of 'Disarming the Great Affordable Housing Debate' presents the perspective that affordable housing is a critical issue that needs to be addressed. The major claim of the article is that the debate on affordable housing needs to move beyond ideological arguments and focus on practical solutions.

The author's argument in 'Disarming the Great Affordable Housing Debate' is a response to Edsall's article. The author acknowledges Edsall's argument that there can be negative effects on neighborhoods with an influx of low-income housing but counters by highlighting the benefits of diverse communities.

Greene and Turner present counterclaims to opposing positions by acknowledging the concerns and arguments made by those who oppose affordable housing initiatives. They then provide evidence and reasoning to refute those counterclaims.

Both Edsall and Greene and Turner use rhetorical devices to support their claims. Edsall appeals to logic and reason by presenting data and analysis, while Greene and Turner use emotional appeals to create a sense of empathy and urgency.

'Disarming the Great Affordable Housing Debate' is a convincing argument as it presents a thoughtful analysis of the issue and provides practical solutions. The authors address counterarguments, use rhetorical devices effectively, and provide evidence to support their claims.