Final answer:
Sorting statements into incomplete and complete thinking involves evaluating the depth of rhetorical analysis in a text, constructing a solid thesis statement, and meticulously analyzing the writer's use of rhetorical strategies to achieve their persuasive goals.
Step-by-step explanation:
When analyzing the effectiveness of rhetorical appeals in a text, it is essential to differentiate between incomplete thinking and complete thinking. Incomplete thinking may refer to a lack of depth in the analysis or failure to fully engage with the rhetorical strategies used by the writer. Whereas, complete thinking involves thoroughly summarizing, paraphrasing, explaining, analyzing, and evaluating the reading selection, as well as recognizing the writer's intent to either conform to or challenge rhetorical norms.
The evaluative process begins with forming a topic sentence that outlines the main analysis point, stating the writer's most compelling argument, and then elaborating on the rhetorical strategies employed with supporting quotations. Organizing the rhetorical analysis systematically ensures each paragraph has a focused topic sentence and smooth transitions among ideas. By dissecting the composition paragraph by paragraph, one can identify and explain the effectiveness of specific rhetorical devices in supporting the writer's thesis statement.
A thesis statement is crucial as it conveys the opinion on the success of the author's rhetorical strategies in achieving the intended persuasive effect. A solid analysis will be based on clearly understanding the writer's persuasive success or lack thereof, and articulating these observations into a coherent thesis statement that drives the rhetorical examination.