Final answer:
After the organization of the research study is explained, an evidence-based article would typically proceed with either a Results section or a combined Results and Discussion section, followed by a Conclusion and References or Works Cited.
Step-by-step explanation:
After the section explaining how the research study was organized to answer the research question, a typical evidence-based article in the social sciences or other scientific fields would commonly include either the Results section or a combined Results and Discussion section. In the Results section, the author would narrate the experimental findings with supporting material such as figures, pictures, diagrams, graphs, and tables, without offering further interpretation. If a separate Discussion section follows, it would involve the interpretation of those results, description of how variables may be related, attempts to explain the observations, and contextualization of the results within previously published scientific research, including proper citations. Alternatively, a combined Results and Discussion section would serve both purposes, presenting the findings and immediately interpreting and discussing them. Following these sections, the Conclusion would summarize the importance of the experimental findings, reflect on the relationship between those findings and the existing body of knowledge, and may also identify potential areas for future research. Lastly, the article would end with References or Works Cited, listing all sources that were used in the development of the research, ensuring the credibility of the paper and providing readers with resources for further study.