106k views
0 votes
What is the basis of any legitimate government according to Michael and Luke Paulsen? Explain why you agree or disagree with their perspective.

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

John Locke believed that a legitimate government is one that is based on the consent of the governed and that protects natural rights. Although Michael and Luke Paulsen are not specifically referenced in the provided information, Locke's principles are a foundational element in discussions of political legitimacy.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Basis of Legitimate Government According to Locke

The question addresses the ideas of Michael and Luke Paulsen regarding the foundation of a legitimate government. However, details provided relate to the philosophy of John Locke, who posited that a legitimate government is based on the consent of the governed and its primary role is to protect the natural rights of life, liberty, and property. While Michael and Luke Paulsen are not explicitly mentioned in the provided text, Locke's philosophy is often cited in discussions about the legitimacy of government.

Legitimacy, in the political sense, is rooted in the idea that a government must be generally accepted by its citizens to possess the right to govern. This is often measured by the level of adherence to principles such as the rule of law, respecting civil liberties, and the fulfillment of the government's obligations to its citizens. In a democratic society, this often translates into authority being granted through free and fair elections, thereby reflecting the consent of the governed.

Agreeing or disagreeing with Locke's perspective depends on one's own political ideology. Some may argue that the consent of the governed is the only valid basis for a government's legitimacy, while others might emphasize different principles such as the effectiveness, tradition, or divine right of the rulers.

User Flatliner DOA
by
8.4k points