Final answer:
One argument against the value of parole boards is their failure to consider the victim's statement. They may also prioritize overcrowding over rehabilitation, not encourage behavior change, and cost taxpayers extra money.
Step-by-step explanation:
One argument against the value of parole boards is that they are not obligated to listen to the victim's statement. This can be seen as a failure to fully consider the impact of the crime on the victim and can lead to a lack of accountability for the offender.
Another argument is that parole boards might release someone due to overcrowding in prison rather than focusing on rehabilitation. This can prioritizes the management of the prison population over the goal of reducing recidivism and promoting behavior change.
Additionally, parole boards may not effectively encourage incarcerated individuals to change their behavior. Without adequate support and resources, parolees may struggle to reintegrate into society and have a higher likelihood of reoffending.
Lastly, parole boards can be costly, placing an additional financial burden on taxpayers on top of the cost of correctional facilities.