34.2k views
5 votes
In interpreting the constitution, john marshall

O favored the doctrine of loose construction.
O supported the doctrine of strict construction.
O supported an unchanging document.
O advocated state control of interstate commerce.
O set few judicial precedents in his written opinions about cases involving the constitution

User Srph
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

John Marshall favored a loose construction of the Constitution, endorsing judicial review which gave the Supreme Court significant influence over national policy. Therefore, the correct option is A.

Step-by-step explanation:

In interpreting the Constitution, John Marshall favored the doctrine of loose construction. As the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Marshall helped clarify the power of the judicial branch, notably through the landmark decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803). This case established the principle of judicial review, which empowered the Supreme Court to nullify acts of Congress that were in conflict with the Constitution.

Marshall's tenure saw the strengthening of the federal government's role, particularly during the "Era of Good Feelings," where his court made decisions that bolstered the turn toward manufacturing and commercial agriculture. His interpretations of the Constitution were pivotal in guiding national policy and public opinion. Unlike Joseph Story's approach of a fixed and permanent construction, Marshall believed in a more expansive reading that allowed for the Constitution to be applied to contemporary issues beyond the explicit text.

User Parasrish
by
7.6k points