Final answer:
The question of whether Juvencio Nava should be punished for a crime committed thirty-five years ago involves considering legal time limits, the values of deterrence and recidivism, and the balance between punishment and rehabilitation within the justice system.
Step-by-step explanation:
Whether Juvencio Nava should be punished for the murder of Don Lupe Terreros thirty-five years ago is a complex question that delves into various aspects of legal principles and justice system debates. Option 1 emphasizes the sense of justice where any crime warrants punishment, regardless of time passed. Option 2 considers the statute of limitations, a legal principle limiting the time within which legal proceedings may be initiated. Option 3 takes a more rehabilitative approach, considering remorse and the potential for change over time. Punishment and rehabilitation are part of our justice system; however, methods of dealing with crime and incarceration have evolved over time to become more enlightened and sophisticated. It may not always be effective, especially in the case of juvenile incarceration, which has been shown to potentially increase future crime.
Moreover, the debate over capital punishment and life sentences for juveniles reflects the complexity of determining an appropriate sentence and ethos of the justice system. The concept that it's better for 100 guilty people to go free than for an innocent person to be unjustly punished also underscores the intricate balance that societal justice aims to achieve.