Final answer:
Sukarno's rule in Indonesia became increasingly authoritarian, establishing 'Guided Democracy' and aligning with communist countries while suppressing dissent, which contradicts the assertion that he sought to eradicate authoritarianism.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement regarding Sukarno's role in eradicating authoritarianism is not accurate. While Sukarno may have initially promoted the idea of neutrality and independence for Indonesia, his rule gradually became authoritarian. After studying the document excerpt, it is evident that Sukarno, in his speech opening the Bandung conference, did not put forward a path to eradicate authoritarianism, but rather established a form of 'Guided Democracy' where the president held a central role. His strategy, named NASAKOM, combined elements of nationalism, religion, and communism, and saw increased autocratic authority as Sukarno sought to centralize power within his presidency. Furthermore, Sukarno later aligned himself with communist countries and escalated tensions with the United States, which suggested a departure from his initial neutral stance in foreign affairs. This culminated in violent conflicts and a military crackdown led by Suharto with allegations of assistance from the CIA, resulting in a significant loss of life and the eventual overthrow of Sukarno by Suharto who assumed dictatorial powers.